Ruto critics goose cooked as allies scramble for perks

President William Ruto’s administration is facing increasing scrutiny as critics allege the use of state machinery to suppress dissent, while his allies appear to be scrambling for political perks.
The situation has led to a complex political landscape, with accusations of favoritism, unfulfilled promises, and a leadership style that some describe as authoritarian.
Prominent political figures have voiced concerns over what they perceive as a deliberate attempt to silence opposition. Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, once a close ally of Ruto, has expressed frustration over the administration’s actions.
“We are being sidelined, and our voices are being suppressed. The promises made to us during the campaign have not been fulfilled.” This sentiment is echoed by other former allies who feel marginalized in the current political environment.
Additionally, reports of state-sponsored intimidation tactics have surfaced. In one instance, a local politician claimed, “I received threats from government officials warning me to stop criticizing the administration, or there would be consequences.” Such allegations have raised concerns about the erosion of democratic principles and the stifling of free speech.
On the other side of the political spectrum, Ruto’s allies are reportedly scrambling for political perks, leading to a perception of favoritism and patronage. Sources within the administration suggest that appointments to key positions are often based on loyalty rather than merit.
“Many of the recent appointments have been made to reward political supporters, not necessarily those best qualified for the roles,” an insider told Kurunzi News.
This practice has led to discontent among some members of the ruling party who feel that their contributions are being overlooked. One member lamented, “We worked hard to get Ruto elected, but now it seems that only a select few are benefiting from the spoils.”
 
Unfulfilled promises and regional discontent
A significant point of contention is the unfulfilled promises made during the 2022 election campaign. In regions like Mt. Kenya, where Ruto garnered substantial support, there is growing disillusionment over the lack of progress on key issues such as economic recovery and job creation. Local leaders have expressed their dissatisfaction, with one stating, “The President visited our region and made grand promises, but nothing has materialized.”
This sentiment is not isolated. Across various regions, constituents are voicing their concerns about the government’s failure to deliver on its commitments. A recent survey indicated that a significant percentage of Kenyans feel that the administration has not lived up to its promises, leading to a decline in public trust.
 
Ruto’s leadership style has come under increasing scrutiny. Critics argue that his approach is authoritarian, with key decisions being made without adequate consultation with other government officials. One opposition leader commented, “The President is making decisions unilaterally, sidelining his ministers and other stakeholders.”
This centralization of power has led to concerns about the erosion of democratic governance. An analyst noted, “When power is concentrated in the hands of one individual, it undermines the checks and balances that are essential for a healthy democracy.”
Media coverage
The media has played a crucial role in shaping public perception of the administration. Investigative reports have highlighted issues such as corruption, misuse of public resources, and the suppression of dissent. A recent exposé revealed that funds allocated for development projects were misappropriated, leading to substandard infrastructure and services.
Public reaction to these revelations has been one of outrage. Citizens are demanding accountability and transparency from their leaders. A protestor at a recent demonstration stated, “We are tired of empty promises and corruption. It’s time for change.”
The current political climate in Kenya is characterized by increasing tension between the administration, its critics, and its allies. Allegations of political suppression, favoritism, and unfulfilled promises have created a volatile environment.
As the 2027 elections approach, the administration faces the challenge of restoring public trust and delivering on its commitments. The coming months will be crucial in determining the direction of the nation’s political landscape.